Thank you for your request. It has been ticketed. Enhancement Request #7581-Penalty for Late Submissions
This honestly would be awesome. It creates a lot of logistical issues when it simply stops accepting entries (email an assignment to a professor only to later find out that it needed to be sent to a TA. Gets lost in TAs email, etc.). It would be great to see better defaults and methods in place for enabling the submission of late work.
Currently, if a course is unpublished, you just have to add items to another class. It would be huge if, even before it is published, a class had a row on the combined schedule.
Just wanting to wake this thread up from its two-year slumber. Was this a part of the original design, at least having a blank row for classes that were not published for this explicit purpose? Still an issue that definitely exists.
If a course is then published, any user-generated 'assignments' should just be added to whatever is published for the course.
Love it. ;) Probably:
(1) classes that aren't using LS should still have a row, but just with an indication that there is nothing published in LS (so that students don't think something is wrong or not realize that information is being posted elsewhere).
(2) Wouldn't it be great if other organizations could have a feed here for one easy stop..... :)
(3) I think that one 'Personal' row, with the possiblealternative of adding multiple rows (for doing the extracurricular things discussed above) could be great.
Thank you for your request. We have added it to our enhancement ticketing system. Enhancement Request #7794—
Toggle Current Progress for Students Performance
Definitely a needed feature, especially with FERPA concerns.
On a TA or Instructor's page of student grades, there's a big need to enable the viewing of a single student's grades so that a student can look with the admin at the screen at the same time to verify things. As it stands, a student cannot look at the grading screen with the instructor without violating FERPA--Most TAs and instructors are likely good about this, but I'd be surprised if it's not happening at all. A little surprised that this has not come up, especially as it represents an area relatively rich in potential legal issues as far as functionality goes in Learning Suite.
I think the simplest way to get a quick fix out for this would be to enable a filter or drop-down on the grades page to show just a single student's information in the existing grade table. This would eliminate the much more costly (long-term solution--maybe) of developing a separate page for viewing a single student's grades. Alternatively/additionally, an icon could be added next to each student to toggle viewing only that student's information in the table.
Thank you for your request. It has been added to the enhancement ticketing system. Enhancement Request #6926—Grade Notification Settings.
Interesting thought, actually, and I don't think it would be terribly difficult to implement.
I'm glad to see the red coloration added in for zeros! :) It's already been helpful to see things that aren't submitted.
This would need to be done in such a way that it doesn't become spammy or else it loses its value in warning people about changes that could potentially be devastating if missed.
I think there is still some value here. Another possible or additional implementation would be to have small colored bubbles show up next to new/changed items on the master schedule.
Just reviewing this and realizing how helpful this would be to make sure that we don't miss obvious discrepancies, etc.
I agree with this. I think it would be good for the TAs/professors to just have an "email students about these grading updates" option. It would just be some sort of check box with a text box to enter an optional description about what was done. It would make it easier for professors/TAs to quickly inform students without needing to put in a lot of effort. There also could possibly be a way to post it as an announcement instead of sending it as an email (perhaps an and/or option).
Just to tighten down functionality, I think that the idea of having an email sent to you IS a good one, but this is something that you need to be able to opt out of somewhere.
Check out the attached file, but the basic idea is that zero grades (After grading and/or due date--this would take a little work to figure out) and abnormally low grades (say 70% and lower) will be marked as shown with dismissable comments. This is just to help students make sure that they don't overlook a missed, ungraded, lost, or late assignment. as soon as they review their grades (or perhaps this could be added to alerts on the dashboard), they'll quickly see the floating alerts and be able to dismiss them if they are aware of the grade.
Though these things are mostly small (and they are), once the Schedule becomes the main landing page, I think that having these small things worked out will help to increase overall satisfaction to at least some degree and avoid a little unnecessary flak for 2-8 manhours of labor. These things (save the self-made notes being somehow differently marked--this really has caused heartburn before) are mostly polish, but I think it's worth the small amount of extra effort to have things ready when this goes more mainstream. I still very rarely meet people that know about the aggregated schedule. (You may or may not have an evangelist in the field ;)
I am the definition of loving Windows 8, but unfortunately, I think that the resources that would go into this would be better spent on improving the website. As an upside, as the web keeps progressing, it may become more possible for information to be stored within a browser specifically for offline access. ;) Definitely a way off yet, but at some point in the future (2-7 years) it could be a possibility!
This also would help to cutdown on rumors about assignments and perhaps even inappropriate discussion of quizzes or exams that professors do not want students talking about. It changes the source of questions from being other students to being the ones who originally assigned it. I really think it would cut down on redundant discussion and would help restore the professors and TAs as the authorities on assignments. The UI definitely will take some thinking, but I think it could have at least:
- general updates/posts
- asked questsons with answers from prof/TAs
- questions purposefully posed by prof/TAs
Thank you for your enhancement request. It has been added to the ticketing system. Response email sent. Enhancement Request #8108—Add A Search Feature.
Enhancement Request #7848—Temporarily Create/Add Assignments in What if Calculator
I recently ran into this issue--though we may know be able to do all of the weighting correctly, this could be a helpful feature to have.
Also, I like Sean Fisher's idea here--it is very true. One very common use case may be late or make up assignments where you may have received a '0' on several assignments but that you know you can make up.
I'm assuming this is talking about editing, correct? Initial entry does not require a fly out.
@Trent Despain: (Very unrelated to the idea at hand) I'd be sure to call OIT with that issue. If that is a consistent issue, help them to become more aware of it so that they can help fix it. I believe that's a priority for them.
There are, unfortunately, a *lot* of logistical issues to this in current web technologies. It's getting there, but this is (I would assume) probably a few years out from really being terribly feasible, especially with issues of accessing old content, taking exams, etc. Eventually there could be some very cool things here though! We'll just have to see which way the wind blows with technology and its standards these next few years!
Even though summer term has been over for over two weeks (http://saas.byu.edu/calendar/2013.php), I still don't see Fall courses by default on the Learning Suite home page as they are still considered future courses and not current. :( This means that if I do have anything for my courses, it wouldn't be showing up on the schedule yet.
Please consider switching courses from future to current much sooner, at least one week before the next semester will be beginning. I can understand the desire to have the current semester for a few days after it ends, but keeping it so long that it infringes on the ability to prepare fully (meaning using all resources on Learning Suite as if the semester was current) is too long. I think making this change will better encourage students to begin preparing earlier.
As always, thank you very much for an amazing tool--I truly look forward to seeing the combined schedule, understanding that for the first go through, there are going to be things that will need updating, fixing, etc. Thanks for all you do!
This is a great idea. I have added it to the Redmine system
Enhancement Request #907
Asynchronously load thumbnails for the current showing page and just a few more. Let them be grabbed in AJAX calls as you move down the page. Even a low def image would probably be nice to have.
This request has been entered into the ticketing system for learning suite.
Enhancement Request #5174
TAs hours could perhaps be included on the general calendar discussed on the student side? Might be difficult or not worth it, but just a thought. They can just post their hours there.